Patient-reported Outcomes of Donor Site Healing Using Different Palatal Protection Techniques
Start Date
3/7/2025
Completion Date
7/1/2026
Summary
This study has been initiated to evaluate the question, "What is the best way to protect the palate after a gum graft is removed?" The overall objective is to determine if there is a difference in PROMs of donor site healing using different palatal post-operative protection techniques.
Detailed Description
This study aims to determine if there is a difference in subject-reported outcome measures (PROMs) when different palatal post-operative protection techniques are used during healing after an autogenous soft-tissue graft is harvested from the palate for periodontal and peri-implant plastic surgery. The secondary objective is to evaluate if there is a difference in the healing of the palatal tissue via photographic and 3D linear and volumetric changes analysis after using the different protective techniques. Furthermore, the study will evaluate the time needed for fabrication and intraoral adjustment of each protective barrier and professional preference among the techniques utilized.
Eligibility Criteria
Age Range: 18 years to No maximum
Interventions
Visual Analog scale (VAS) questionnaire
Vacuum-formed retainer (VFR) technique
3-D printed acrylic resin stent (3DS) technique
Flowable resin composite stent (FRC) technique
Photographs of the patient's palate
Measuring graft dimensions
Chairside Polymer Stent
Conditions
Locations
Virginia Commonwealth University
Richmond, Virginia 232398
United States