Clinical Trials Near Amsterdam, Netherlands
Find research studies actively recruiting participants near Amsterdam. Studies are run at established research institutions including Amsterdam UMC and Netherlands Cancer Institute.
Top Research Institutions in Amsterdam
Amsterdam UMC
Netherlands Cancer Institute
Recruiting Studies Near Amsterdam
A Study of the Long-term Safety and Efficacy of Danicamtiv in Adults With Symptomatic Genetic and Familial Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Danicamtiv is an investigational medication, which means it is still being studied and has not been approved. The purpose of this study is to learn how well danicamtiv works, how safe it is, how well people can take it when used in patients with genetic or familial dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM). There are currently no approved medicines made specifically to treat genetic or familial DCM.
DESCARTES: De-ESCAlation of RadioTherapy in Patients With Pathologic Complete rESponse to Neoadjuvant Systemic Therapy
This study evaluates whether radiotherapy can safely be omitted in breast cancer patients with T1-2N0 tumors who achieve a pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant systemic therapy and breast-conserving surgery
UCAN CAN-DU: Canada-Netherlands Personalized Medicine Network in Childhood Arthritis and Rheumatic Disease
Childhood arthritis is a chronic disabling disease. New medications called biologic therapies are now available to treat arthritis that target key biologic molecules that cause inflammation. Biologic therapies, while very effective in treating arthritis in children, may have serious side effects including infections and potentially cancers, and are very expensive and doctors don't know, which one to choose for which child. The investigators will develop tests that enable them to learn about the biology of each child's arthritis and be able to predict when and which biologic therapy to start and when to stop.
Dutch-AMR: Early Mitral Valve Repair Versus Watchful Waiting in Asymptomatic Patients With Severe Mitral Regurgitation
Rationale: Severe asymptomatic organic Mitral Valve (MV) regurgitation with preserved left ventricular (LV) function is a challenging clinical entity as data on the recommended treatment strategy for these patients are scarce and conflicting, which is reflected in current guidelines. European guidelines advocate a more conservative strategy i.e. watchful waiting, with yearly echocardiography, whilst American guidelines are more in favour of early surgery to reconstruct the MV, i.e. MV repair (in contrast to MV replacement) in order to prevent future LV dysfunction and complaints. A number of non-randomised trials show a favourable outcome of early surgery: in the study of Enriquez-Sarano et al. for instance, the early surgery strategy has shown to be associated with improved long-term survival, decreased cardiac mortality, and decreased morbidity compared with the conservative management \[1\]. On the other hand, non-randomised trials describe also that a conservative strategy (i.e. watchful waiting) can be safely accomplished. If facilitated surgery is performed in this population (50% at 10 years follow-up according to Rosenhek et al \[2\]), it has proven to be eventually associated with good perioperative and postoperative outcome when careful follow-up is being carried out \[2\]. Objective: To compare early MV repair versus watchful waiting in asymptomatic patients with severe organic mitral valve regurgitation and preserved left ventricular function. Study design: Multicenter, registry trial. Study population: 250 Asymptomatic patients (18-75 years old) with severe organic MV regurgitation and preserved left ventricular function. The current European Society of Cardiology (ESC) guidelines on Valvular Heart Disease will be applied \[3\]. These guidelines are also used in the Netherlands. Accordingly, patients with an indication for MV surgery will not be included. Intervention: Intervention will be early MV repair compared to a watchful waiting strategy.
Zilebesiran in Patients With Hypertension Not Adequately Controlled and With Either Established Cardiovascular Disease or High Risk for Cardiovascular Disease
The purpose of this study is to evaluate whether zilebesiran versus placebo reduces the risk of cardiovascular (CV) death, nonfatal myocardial infarction (MI), nonfatal stroke, or heart failure (HF) events. This is an event-driven study that will continue until the targeted number of positively adjudicated primary endpoint clinical outcome events (COEs) have been reached.
The Dragon PLC Trial (DRAGON-PLC)
The goal of the DRAGON PLC clinical trial is to determine whether portal vein embolization (PVE) combined with hepatic vein embolization (HVE) improves resectability and overall survival in patients with initially unresectable primary liver cancer compared to standard PVE alone. This trial specifically focuses on patients with hepatocellular carcinoma and cholangiocarcinoma. The main questions this trial aims to answer are whether combined PVE and HVE increases the proportion of patients who become resectable within 3 weeks and improves 5-year overall survival compared to PVE alone by enhancing liver hypertrophy. Participants will: * Undergo either standard PVE or combined PVE and HVE. * Have regular imaging to assess liver resectability. * Be monitored for survival outcomes up to 5 years after intervention.
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of KarXT + KarX-EC for Cognitive Impairment in Alzheimer's Disease
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of KarXT + KarX-EC for cognitive impairment in Alzheimer's Disease
Postoperative Re-irradiaTion With and Without HYPERthermia, or Surgery Only: Toxicity, Quality of Life and Survival in Patients With Locoregional Recurrent Breast Cancer
In the Netherlands, breast cancer patients with locoregional recurrence (LRR) and intermediate- and high-risk factors are treated with surgery with or without postoperative re-irradiation with or without hyperthermia. Retrospective studies showed that 3-year locoregional control after postoperative re-irradiation with hyperthermia was 68-83%, and severe toxicity in up to 40% of LRR patients. Unfortunately, no prospective (randomized) data are available on clinical outcomes. Consequently, variation exists in hyperthermia-treatment and re-irradiation schedules. Prospective real-world data on oncological outcomes, toxicity and quality of life is highly needed for shared decision-making between patients and professionals. These data will be used in the design of a future randomized trial in high-risk LRR patients.
A Study of Vedolizumab With and Without Upadacitinib in Adults With Crohn's Disease
The main aim of this study is to learn whether vedolizumab and upadacitinib given together (also called dual targeted therapy or DTT) reduces bowel inflammation and ulcers in the bowel compared to vedolizumab only (also called monotherapy) in adults with moderately or severely active Crohn's Disease (CD) after 12 weeks of treatment. Other aims are to learn how safe and effective DTT is compared to monotherapy for these participants. All participants will receive DTT (either vedolizumab and upadacitinib or vedolizumab and placebo) for 12 weeks. Participants responding to the treatment will then receive vedolizumab only (monotherapy) for an additional 40 weeks. During the study, participants will visit their study clinic 15 times.
A Clinical Study of MK-3120 in People With Bladder Cancer (MK-3120-003)
Researchers are looking for new ways to treat high-risk non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (HR NMIBC). NMIBC is cancer in the tissue that lines the inside of the bladder and has not spread to the bladder muscle or outside of the bladder. In standard treatment for HR NMIBC, doctors first remove the tumor with a procedure called transurethral resection of the bladder tumor (TURBT). Researchers want to learn if using MK-3120, the study medicine, can treat HR NMIBC after TURBT. The goal of this study is to learn about the safety of MK-3120 and if people tolerate it.
Clinical Trials in Amsterdam: FAQ
How do I find clinical trials near Amsterdam?
Corterve aggregates all actively recruiting clinical trials near Amsterdam, Netherlands from the ClinicalTrials.gov database. Simply browse the listings on this page or take our assessment to find trials that may be relevant.
Does it cost anything to take part in a study?
Costs, travel support, and any payment for taking part vary by study. Ask the study team what is covered before you decide to join.
What research institutions are located in Amsterdam?
Amsterdam is home to several leading research institutions, including Amsterdam UMC, Netherlands Cancer Institute. These facilities run clinical trials across Oncology, Neurology, Cardiology, and other therapeutic areas.
Popular Conditions Recruiting Near Amsterdam
Ready to see studies near you?
Take our assessment to see research studies recruiting near Amsterdam that may be relevant. Study teams decide who joins.
See studies near you