Bowel Continence Across the Lifespan in People With Spina Bifida
Start Date
4/1/2026
Completion Date
5/1/2030
Summary
The goal of this observational study is to learn how different enema programs affect bowel control in children and adults with spina bifida. An enema program involves putting liquid into the large intestine (colon) to help someone poop. The main questions it aims to answer are: 1. How well do different enema programs prevent bowel accidents? 2. How do these enema programs affect independence, bowel symptoms, and quality of life? Researchers will compare two types of enema programs to see which works better and is easier for participants to manage. Participants starting a new enema program will answer online survey questions at 3 different timepoints over the course of 1 year.
Detailed Description
Spina bifida is a rare disease affecting an estimated 166,000 people in the United States. Because of the birth defect in the spinal cord, many organ systems do not work properly. Included among these affected organ systems are the bowels or intestines, which can lead to bowel incontinence or bowel accidents. Bowel incontinence is very disruptive to the lives of people with spina bifida by affecting their ability to have romantic relationships, find jobs, and overall enjoy their lives. The spina bifida community has recognized bowel incontinence as a top priority for research. Typically, reducing bowel incontinence and improving bowel continence occurs in a stepwise fashion. After medications by mouth such as laxatives or stool softeners, 2nd line treatments include enema programs. Two types of enema programs currently exist, those given in either a backward direction (given through the anus or end of the large intestine or colon) or in a forward direction (given through a tube that enters the start of the large intestine or colon). These two types of enema programs have different positives and negatives which have not been compared nor studied well. The lack of evidence on which is the better enema program presents a key decisional dilemma for many people with spina bifida who want to improve their bowel continence. In the current study, the study team will compare the two types of enema programs in 943 children and adults ages 5 years old and up with spina bifida at 24 centers across the United States. The enema programs will be assigned to and started by the participants as part of usual clinical care from their local clinical team. At 6 months and 12 months over a 1-year study period, the study team will look at how the two types of enema programs compare in bowel continence (how well they work to prevent bowel accidents), quality of life (how much people enjoy their lives), bowel symptoms (how well they work to reduce bowel-related symptoms), self-management and independence (how well people can do these enema programs themselves without help), and healthcare utilization (how often these enema programs cause problems needing medical help). The study team will also ask 20 children with spina bifida, 20 adults with spina bifida, and 20 caregivers of children and adults with spina bifida more detailed interview questions about their lived experiences with managing bowel incontinence and their thoughts on how best to start and maintain a successful enema program. The expected study results will help people with spina bifida not only improve their bowel continence, but also their quality of life. The study team is working with patient and family partners within the spina bifida community, healthcare providers across numerous disciplines, national advocacy organizations (the Spina Bifida Association), and industry partners who make enema devices to design and conduct this study.
Eligibility Criteria
Age Range: 5 years to No maximum
Interventions
Retrograde Enema
Antegrade Enema
Conditions
Locations
University of Alabama at Birmingham
Birmingham, Alabama 35205
United States
Children's of Alabama
Birmingham, Alabama 35233
United States
Phoenix Children's Hospital
Phoenix, Arizona 85006
United States
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California 90027
United States
University of California San Francisco
San Francisco, California 94158
United States
Children's Hospital of Colorado
Denver, Colorado 80218
United States
Children's National Hospital
Washington D.C., District of Columbia 20010
United States
Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children's Hospital of Chicago
Chicago, Illinois 60611
United States
Northwestern University
Chicago, Illinois 60611
United States
Riley Children's Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana 46202
United States
Boston Children's Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts 02115
United States
University of Michigan
Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109
United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina 27705
United States
Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center
Cincinnati, Ohio 45229
United States
Cleveland Clinic
Cleveland, Ohio 44195
United States
Nationwide Children's Hospital
Columbus, Ohio 43205
United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19139
United States
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15224
United States
Monroe Carell Jr. Children's Hospital at Vanderbilt
Nashville, Tennessee 37232
United States
Scottish Rite for Children
Dallas, Texas 75219
United States
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas 77030
United States
Primary Children's Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah 84113
United States
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington 98105
United States
University of Washington
Seattle, Washington 98195
United States